Pragmatism and idealism are two different approaches to understanding and solving problems. Pragmatism is a practical and realistic approach focusing on what is possible and what works. On the other hand, idealism is an idealistic and theoretical approach that focuses on what should and could be. Pragmatism is based on the idea that the best course of action is the one that produces the most beneficial results. It is a problem-solving approach focused on finding practical solutions to real-world problems. Pragmatists are often described as “down-to-earth,” “realistic,” and “practical” in their thinking. They are less concerned with abstract theories and more focused on finding practical solutions in the here and now. Idealism, on the other hand, is based on the idea that the best course of action is the one that is in line with our ideals and values. It is an approach focused on finding solutions to problems consistent with our beliefs about how things should be. Idealists are often described as “idealistic,” “theoretical,” and “ideal-driven” in their thinking. They are less concerned with practical considerations and more focused on finding solutions that align with their ideals and values. One of the critical differences between pragmatism and idealism is their approach to problem-solving. Pragmatists focus on finding practical solutions to problems, while idealists find solutions that align with their ideals and values. For example, a pragmatist might concentrate on finding a solution that is the most cost-effective and efficient. At the same time, an idealist might focus on finding a solution most consistent with their ideals of fairness and justice.

Another difference between pragmatism and idealism is their approach to change. Pragmatists often accept incremental change more, while idealists focus on radical change. Pragmatists believe that change should be gradual and that small steps are more likely to be successful than giant leaps. Idealists believe that radical change is necessary to achieve their ideals and values. One of the benefits of pragmatism is that it is more likely to lead to practical solutions that can be implemented in the real world. Pragmatists are less likely to be bogged down by abstract theories and more likely to find effective and efficient solutions. They are also more likely to be realistic about what is possible and what is not. One of the benefits of idealism is that it is more likely to lead to solutions consistent with our ideals and values. Idealists are more likely to find solutions that are fair and that are in line with what we believe is right. They are also more likely to be motivated by a sense of purpose and meaning. However, pragmatism and idealism also have their limitations. Pragmatism can be criticised for being too focused on practical considerations and not considering the ideals and values essential to society. Idealism can be blamed for being too focused on abstract theories and not considering the practical considerations necessary for success.

With its rich cultural and philosophical heritage, India has been home to some of the world’s greatest philosophers and thinkers, who have contributed to developing various schools of thought. One of India’s most prominent schools of thought is Vedanta, which is based on the principles of idealism.

However, India is also a country that has faced numerous challenges and problems, such as poverty, corruption, and inequality. In recent times, there has been a growing emphasis on pragmatism in India, especially in the context of economic development. The government has introduced various policies and initiatives to promote economic growth, such as the Make in India program and the Digital India campaign.

The balance between pragmatism and idealism is particularly relevant in the context of politics and governance in India. A tension between pragmatism and idealism has characterised Indian politics. On the one hand, some advocate for pragmatic policies that focus on delivering tangible results in the short term. On the other hand, some prioritise ideological goals, such as social justice and equality, even if it takes longer to achieve them.

One example of this tension can be seen in the debate around implementing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. The GST was introduced in 2017 as a unified tax system to replace indirect taxes. The implementation of the GST was a major policy reform that aimed at simplifying the tax system and promoting economic growth. However, there were concerns that the GST would lead to inflation and adversely affect small businesses.

The debate around the GST reflected the tension between pragmatism and idealism. Those who supported the GST argued that it was a pragmatic policy that would benefit the economy in the long term. On the other hand, those who opposed the GST asserted that it would have negative consequences for small businesses and would be detrimental to the ideal of social justice.

Another example of the tension between pragmatism and idealism in India can be seen in the debate around the construction of the Sardar Patel statue, also known as the Statue of Unity. The statue, which is the tallest in the world, was built to honour Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, a prominent leader of the Indian independence movement. Some saw the statue as a symbol of national pride and unity, while others criticised it as a wasteful expenditure that could have been used to address more pressing social issues.

The debate around the Sardar Patel statue reflected the tension between pragmatism and idealism. Those who supported the statue’s construction argued that it was a pragmatic policy that would promote tourism and generate revenue for the region. On the other hand, those who opposed the statute argued that it was an ideological project that did not address the pressing social issues that India was facing.

In conclusion, both pragmatism and idealism have their benefits and limitations. Pragmatism is a practical and realistic approach that is focused on finding solutions that are effective and efficient. Idealism is an ideological and theoretical approach focused on finding solutions consistent with our ideals and values. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages; the best course of action is often a balance between them.